EXTERNALLY FUNDED RESEARCH PROJECTS
Understanding the rape acknowledgement process: A follow-up study
Background
This study aims to understand the processes involved in rape acknowledgement. Meta-analysis finds that almost two thirds of rape survivors do not use the term "rape" to refer to personal experiences that may objectively match some definition of rape (usually a legal definition). This non-acknowledgement is associated with reduced rates of reporting to police and seeking support (compared with acknowledged rape survivors). While decades of insightful research have been conducted on rape acknowledgment, there is a lack of longitudinal inquiry aimed at understanding how the process of labelling sexual violence unfolds over time.
Aim
This project aims to further illuminate how the process of rape acknowledgement unfolds over time. This study uses two waves of data collection with the same sample of participants, designed to identify commonalities in the process of labelling sexual violence and the meaning survivors ascribe to the label/s they use.
Methods
This study uses two phases of data collection, spaced six months apart, to capture how the acknowledgement process might unfold over time among the same sample of participants.
Quantitative data are collected using an online survey (approx. n=250) measuring experiences of sexual violence, acknowledgement status, and related factors such as support-seeking behaviours.
Qualitative data are collected using semi-structed in-depth interviews (approx. n=10) with women in Queensland who reported an experience categorised as rape on the survey. Interviews covered contextual factors around the assault and the survivor’s journey of acknowledgement.